Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Indicadores
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rev. chil. pediatr ; 90(5): 559-562, oct. 2019.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-1058184

RESUMO

Resumen: A pesar del enorme impacto de las vacunas en la salud de la población, estas han sido y son objeto de cuestionamientos por grupos que las consideran innecesarias o inseguras y argumentan que las personas tienen el derecho a decidir sobre si estas deben ser administradas o no. Sin embargo el uso de vacunas tiene connotaciones distintas a otras decisiones en salud, ya que no vacunar impacta no solo al individuo, sino también a la comunidad que lo rodea. El inmunizar a un alto porcentaje de la población permite limitar la circulación de los agentes infecciosos, logrando la llamada inmunidad comunitaria que protege a los no vacunados por razones médicas o porque son muy pequeños. Por esta razón muchos países han definido las vacunas como obligatorias. Como Comité Consultivo de Inmunizaciones nos parece que esta estrategia es correcta sin embargo debe ser acompañada por una política de educación de la población y personal de salud sobre los beneficios y riesgos reales de las va cunas. Así mismo es necesario introducir mejoras en el sistema de notificación de reacciones adversas a vacunas haciéndolo más accesible. Adicionalmente se debe dar respuesta oportuna a los afectados por supuestas o reales reacciones a vacunas y en los casos de eventos adversos graves efectivamente asociados a vacunas. Entregar cobertura económica y acompañamiento. Finalmente es esencial la coordinación entre los diferentes actores y comunicadores para transmitir mensajes que generen confianza y respondan a las inquietudes de la población de hoy en día.


Abstract: Although vaccines have had a tremendous impact in public health they are questioned by certain groups that consider them unnecessary or unsafe and argue in favor of the right to decide to be vacci nated or not. However vaccines must have special considerations because unlike other medical deci sions, not vaccinating has consequences not only for the individual but also for other members of the community. Immunizing a high proportion of the population limits the circulation of an infectious agent attaining what is called community or herd immunity that protects the susceptible members of the group. For this reason many countries consider vaccination mandatory as a responsibility of every citizen. This committee agrees with this view but thinks other strategies should be implemented as well, such as special educational efforts for the public and parents addressing benefits and real risks of vaccinating. Also health care professionals should be trained in vaccines. The notification system for adverse events currently available should be improved and be more accessible. Persons truly affected by adverse events due to vaccination should receive on time responses and be offered psychological and financial support. Finally all stakeholders should make coordinated efforts to work together to deliver messages that answer concerns on vaccines and bring confidence back to the public.


Assuntos
Humanos , Vacinas/administração & dosagem , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Política de Saúde , Pais/psicologia , Chile , Saúde Pública , Educação em Saúde/métodos , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Imunidade Coletiva , Recusa de Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência
2.
Rev. chil. infectol ; 34(6): 583-586, dic. 2017.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: biblio-899763

RESUMO

Resumen A pesar del enorme impacto de las vacunas en la salud de la población, éstas han sido y son objeto de cuestionamientos por grupos que las consideran innecesarias o inseguras y argumentan que las personas tienen el derecho a decidir sobre si éstas deben ser administradas o no. Sin embargo, el uso de vacunas tiene connotaciones distintas a otras decisiones en salud, ya que no vacunar impacta no sólo al individuo, sino también a la comunidad que lo rodea. El inmunizar a un alto porcentaje de la población permite limitar la circulación de los agentes infecciosos, logrando la llamada inmunidad comunitaria que protege a los no vacunados por razones médicas o porque son muy pequeños. Por esta razón muchos países han definido las vacunas como obligatorias. Como Comité Consultivo de Inmunizaciones nos parece que esta estrategia es correcta; sin embargo, debe ser acompañada por una política de educación de la población y personal de salud sobre los beneficios y riesgos reales de las vacunas. Así mismo es necesario introducir mejoras en el sistema de notificación de reacciones adversas a vacunas haciéndolo más accesible. Adicionalmente, se debe dar respuesta oportuna a los afectados por supuestas o reales reacciones a vacunas, y en los casos de eventos adversos graves efectivamente asociados a vacunas. entregar cobertura económica y acompañamiento. Finalmente, es esencial la coordinación entre los diferentes actores y comunicadores para transmitir mensajes que generen confianza y respondan a las inquietudes de la población de hoy en día.


Although vaccines have had a tremendous impact in public health they are questioned by certain groups that consider them unnecessary or unsafe and argue in favor of the right to decide to be vaccinated or not. However vaccines must have special considerations because unlike other medical decisions, not vaccinating has consequences not only for the individual but also for other members of the community. Immunizing a high proportion of the population limits the circulation of an infectious agent attaining what is called herd immunity that protects the susceptible members of the group. For this reason many countries consider vaccination mandatory as a responsibility of every citizen. This committee agrees with this view but thinks other strategies should be implemented as well, such as special educational efforts for the public and parents addressing benefits and real risks of vaccinating. Also health care professionals should be trained in vaccines. The notification system for adverse events currently available should be improved and be more accessible. Persons truly affected by adverse events due to vaccination should receive on time responses and be offered psychological and financial support. Finally all stakeholders should make coordinated efforts to work together to deliver messages that answer concerns on vaccines and bring confidence back to the public.


Assuntos
Humanos , Sociedades Médicas , Vacinação/normas , Programas de Imunização/normas , Programas Obrigatórios/normas , Recusa de Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Chile , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/legislação & jurisprudência , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis/normas , Fatores de Risco , Vacinação/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Programas Obrigatórios/legislação & jurisprudência , Política de Saúde
3.
Rev. méd. Chile ; 133(8): 911-918, ago. 2005. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-429225

RESUMO

Background: Infants and toddlers have the highest influenza hospitalization rate in pediatrics. Although the impact of this virus in children has been recognized, there is no defined statement related to vaccination in this population. Aim: To describe clinical and epidemiological characteristics of complicated influenza infections in hospitalized children. Material and methods: All hospitalizations due to influenza virus were recorded prospectively between March and June 2004. Results: We registered 40 laboratory-confirmed influenza admissions. Median age was 24 months (range: 15 days-14.5 years), 52% males, 18 younger than 2 years. Most of them had an underlying medical condition. The most common conditions were recurrent wheeze in 17, a neurological disease in 7 and asthma in 6. Twenty had more than one condition and 15 were previously healthy. The average days of respiratory symptoms and fever prior to admission were 5 and 3, respectively. The most common discharge diagnoses were concomitant viral-bacterial pneumonia in 53%, viral pneumonia in 38% and laryngitis in 8%. Influenza virus A was identified in 34/40 children. Oxygen supplementation was required by 34 cases; 20% of which required an O2 inspired fraction over 40%. The average days of hospitalization and oxygen were 4 and 3, respectively. Eleven children were treated with amantadine and 21 with antimicrobials. Four children were admitted to pediatric intensive care units and two cases required non-invasive ventilatory support. No deaths were recorded. Conclusions: Our data confirms the importance of influenza virus infection in children, as measured by admission rates, complications and length of hospital stay. Young children are a risk group for which immunization is recognized as protective.


Assuntos
Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A/isolamento & purificação , Vírus da Influenza B/isolamento & purificação , Influenza Humana/virologia , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Chile/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA